High Court Looks at Another Law Aimed at Online Pornography.

On November 12, 2002, Supreme Court justices will deliberate the third case of its kind in which Congress tries to keep children from viewing indecent content on the World Wide Web. The 2000 law (PL 106-554) at issue stipulates that libraries have to obtain screening software for public computer te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:CQ Weekly Vol. 60; no. 44; pp. 3031 - 3033
Autor principal: Palmer, Elizabeth A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Congressional Quarterly Inc. November 16 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=513158572&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 513158572
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15215997
        3FZ
      jtl: CQ Weekly
      issn: 15215997
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: November 16 2002
      vid: 60
      iid: 44
      pid: 136
      pub: Congressional Quarterly Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui: 513158572
      ppf: 3031
      ppct: 2
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: High Court Looks at Another Law Aimed at Online Pornography.
      aug:
        au: Palmer, Elizabeth A.
      su:
        Internet laws
        Internet pornography
        Freedom of speech
        Public libraries
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          Internet laws
          Internet pornography
          Freedom of speech
          Public libraries
      keyword: United States -- Supreme Court -- Decisions
      ab: On November 12, 2002, Supreme Court justices will deliberate the third case of its kind in which Congress tries to keep children from viewing indecent content on the World Wide Web. The 2000 law (PL 106-554) at issue stipulates that libraries have to obtain screening software for public computer terminals as a condition for getting federal aid available under two programs. Opponents to the law contend that such a requirement violates the constitutional right of free speech
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N