Rematerializing Feminism.

The “cultural turn” in feminism has isolated issues of gender and sexuality from their material conditions. This article addresses this turn by engaging such issues as “gender,” “history,” “agency,” “modernity,” “postmodernity,” “essentialism,” “theory,” “class,” “sexuality,” “identity politics,” “l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Science & Society Vol. 69; no. 1; pp. 33 - 56
Autor principal: Ebert, Teresa L.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Guilford Publications Inc. January 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=513183856&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 513183856
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00368237
        SSO
      jtl: Science & Society
      issn: 00368237
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: January 2005
      vid: 69
      iid: 1
      pid: 186
      pub: Guilford Publications Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        513183856
        10.1521/siso.69.1.33.56798
      ppf: 33
      ppct: 23
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Rematerializing Feminism.
      aug:
        au: Ebert, Teresa L.
      su:
        Feminism
        Working class
        Social action
      sug:
        subj:
          Feminism
          Working class
          Social action
      ab: The “cultural turn” in feminism has isolated issues of gender and sexuality from their material conditions. This article addresses this turn by engaging such issues as “gender,” “history,” “agency,” “modernity,” “postmodernity,” “essentialism,” “theory,” “class,” “sexuality,” “identity politics,” “labor” and the “concrete” in their materiality. While “post” theories have treated these and related practices as “cultural” effects and regarded them as (semi-) autonomous acts of resistance, culture is never isolated from its material base and cultural resistance, in and of itself, is not capable of transforming social totality. The most effective way to undertake such a transformation is by class struggle, which brings about “root” changes through reorganizing the relations of labor and capital and puts an end to social class. All social differences, such as gender, are the effect of class — the inequality of labor. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N