The Aramaic Dialect(s) of the Toldot Yeshu Fragments.
The Aramaic fragments of the Toldot Yeshu have long been recognized as the oldest version of this polemical tradition which was translated, and elaborated, into many other languages, and transmitted throughout the centuries after its inception. The Aramaic dialect of these fragments has been describ...
| Publicado en: | Aramaic Studies Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 39 - 74 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Brill Academic Publishers
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=51388828&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 51388828 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 14778351 P6Q jtl: Aramaic Studies issn: 14778351 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: 2009 vid: 7 iid: 1 pid: 639 pub: Brill Academic Publishers artinfo: ui: 51388828 10.1163/147783509X12462819875472 ppf: 39 ppct: 35 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 352KB tig: atl: The Aramaic Dialect(s) of the Toldot Yeshu Fragments. aug: au: Smelik, Willem F. affil: Department of Hebrew and Jewish Studies, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, England. su: Dialects Sociolinguistics Literary adaptations Translations Sociology sug: subj: Dialects Sociolinguistics Literary adaptations Translations Sociology keyword: BABYLONIAN ARAMAIC DIALECTAL TRANSLATION LITERARY ARAMAIC object marker PALESTINIAN ARAMAIC polemic Toldot Yeshu ab: The Aramaic fragments of the Toldot Yeshu have long been recognized as the oldest version of this polemical tradition which was translated, and elaborated, into many other languages, and transmitted throughout the centuries after its inception. The Aramaic dialect of these fragments has been described as an artificial mixture of Palestinian and Babylonian Aramaic. A grammatical analysis of each of these fragments reveals that they display the signs of an incomplete dialectal translation from Western to Eastern Aramaic, with conspicuous Western Aramaic morphemes in one fragment. On the other hand, the vast majority of the text of the other fragments is written in a blend of two Eastern Aramaic stocks, one literary type Aramaic which resembles that of Onqelos, and one more colloquial dialect which comes very close to Talmudic Aramaic. Finally, the hybrid construction of the agreement pronoun attached to the nota objecti, followed by the direct object marked by, suggests that the text received further linguistic updating in the West at a relatively late stage in the textual history of this tradition. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Aramaic Studies is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Aramaic Studies holder: Brill Academic Publishers dt: @attributes: year: 2009 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|