Fragments IV and V of the "Canterbury Tales" Do Not Exist.

Presents literary criticism of the book "Canterbury Tales" by Geoffrey Chaucer. The author discusses the fragments IV and V of the "Canterbury Tales" which do not exist in which he offers renewed and wider attention to the dubiousness of the fragment break by offering detailed decisive consideration...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Chaucer Review Vol. 45; no. 1; pp. 1 - 32
Autor principal: Meyer-Lee, Robert J.
Formato: Literary Criticism
Publicado: Pennsylvania State University Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=51694357&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 51694357
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00092002
        CHV
      jtl: Chaucer Review
      issn: 00092002
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2010
      vid: 45
      iid: 1
      pid: 745
      pub: Pennsylvania State University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        51694357
        10.5325/chaucerrev.45.1.0001
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 31
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 747KB
      tig:
        atl: Fragments IV and V of the "Canterbury Tales" Do Not Exist.
      aug:
        au: Meyer-Lee, Robert J.
        affil: Indiana University, South Bend
      su:
        Canterbury Tales
        Chaucer, Geoffrey, d. 1400
        Manuscripts
        Fiction
      sug:
        subj:
          Canterbury Tales
          Chaucer, Geoffrey, d. 1400
          Manuscripts
          Fiction
      ab: Presents literary criticism of the book "Canterbury Tales" by Geoffrey Chaucer. The author discusses the fragments IV and V of the "Canterbury Tales" which do not exist in which he offers renewed and wider attention to the dubiousness of the fragment break by offering detailed decisive considerations of the manuscript evidence for the IV-V link and the editorial intervention that resulted in its current representation. It also shows textual analysis from the lines in the story.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Literary Criticism
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Chaucer Review is the property of Pennsylvania State University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Chaucer Review
      holder: Pennsylvania State University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2010
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N