Life beyond Biologism.

In a move that has puzzled commentators, Derrida's The Animal that Therefore I Am rejects claims for continuity between the human and the animal, aligning such claims with the ideology of “biologistic continuism.” This problematization of the logic of the human-animal limit holds implications for ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Research in Phenomenology Vol. 40; no. 2; pp. 243 - 267
Autor principal: Toadvine, Ted
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Brill Academic Publishers 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=51882385&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 51882385
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00855553
        RPH
      jtl: Research in Phenomenology
      issn: 00855553
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2010
      vid: 40
      iid: 2
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        51882385
        10.1163/156916410X509940
      ppf: 243
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 354KB
      tig:
        atl: Life beyond Biologism.
      aug:
        au: Toadvine, Ted
        affil: University of Oregon
      su:
        Animals
        Sociobiology
        Modern philosophy
        Evolutionary theories
        Phenomenology
      sug:
        subj:
          Animals
          Sociobiology
          Modern philosophy
          Evolutionary theories
          Phenomenology
      keyword:
        ANIMALS
        BIOLOGISM
        Derrida
        EVOLUTION
        Merleau-Ponty
        phenomenology
      ab: In a move that has puzzled commentators, Derrida's The Animal that Therefore I Am rejects claims for continuity between the human and the animal, aligning such claims with the ideology of “biologistic continuism.” This problematization of the logic of the human-animal limit holds implications for how we are to understand life in relation to auto-affection, immanence in relation to transcendence, and naturalism in relation to phenomenology. Derrida's abyssal logic parallels the “strange kinship” described by Merleau-Ponty, though only if this strangeness is intensified as “hetero-affection” by incorporating death into life. Following Merleau-Ponty and Elizabeth Grosz, we locate the creative moment of this abyssal intimacy in the transformative productions of sexual difference. This positive account of the excess of hetero-affection reconciles phenomenology with evolution and offers a figure for thinking the thickening and multiplying of the differences between human and non-human, living and nonliving, corporeal and cosmic.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Research in Phenomenology is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Research in Phenomenology
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2010
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N