Does online psychological test administration facilitate faking?

This study examined for the first time the effect of delivery mode on faking good and faking bad in psychological testing. Participants (N=223) completed questionnaires either online or in pen-and-paper format in a mixed experimental design. After completing measures of personality (HEXACO-60, Ashto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers in Human Behavior Vol. 27; no. 6; pp. 2386 - 2392
Main Authors: Grieve, Rachel, De Groot, Hidee Tania
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier Science November 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=525474543&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 525474543
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07475632
        JC4
      jtl: Computers in Human Behavior
      issn: 07475632
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: November 2011
      vid: 27
      iid: 6
      pid: 2410
      pub: Elsevier Science
    artinfo:
      ui:
        525474543
        10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.001
      ppf: 2386
      ppct: 6
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Does online psychological test administration facilitate faking?
      aug:
        au:
          Grieve, Rachel
          De Groot, Hidee Tania
      su:
        Personality tests
        Truthfulness & falsehood
        Computer software
        Examinations
      sug:
        subj:
          Personality tests
          Truthfulness & falsehood
          Computer software
          Examinations
      keyword: Personality tests -- Administration
      ab: This study examined for the first time the effect of delivery mode on faking good and faking bad in psychological testing. Participants (N=223) completed questionnaires either online or in pen-and-paper format in a mixed experimental design. After completing measures of personality (HEXACO-60, Ashton & Lee, 2009) and depression (DASS-21, Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995) under standard instructions, participants then faked the personality measure as if applying for a job, and faked the depression measure as if experiencing severe depression. Equivalence of internet and pen-and paper-administration on faking was then measured between groups. As predicted, participants were able to fake good on the HEXACO-60 and to fake bad on the DASS-21. Also as predicted, there were no significant differences in faked scores as a function of test administration mode. Further, examination of effect sizes confirmed that the influence of test administration mode was small. It was concluded that online and pen-and paper presentation are largely equivalent when an individual is faking responses in psychological testing. Given the advantages of online assessment and the importance of valid psychological testing, future research should investigate whether the current findings can be generalised to other faking and malingering scenarios and to other psychological measures.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N