Episodic, Generalized, and Semantic Memory Tests: Switching and Strength Effects.
We continue the process of investigating the probabilistic paired associate paradigm in an effort to understand the memory access control processes involved and to determine whether the memory structure produced is in transition between episodic and semantic memory. In this paradigm two targets are...
| Publicado en: | Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology Vol. 65; no. 3; pp. 192 - 200 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Canadian Psychological Association
September 2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=525476655&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 525476655 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 11961961 CJX jtl: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology issn: 11961961 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: September 2011 vid: 65 iid: 3 pid: 98 pub: Canadian Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 525476655 10.1037/a0023374 ppf: 192 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 105KB tig: atl: Episodic, Generalized, and Semantic Memory Tests: Switching and Strength Effects. aug: au: Humphreys, Michael S. Murray, Krista L. su: Autobiographical memory Semantic memory Task analysis sug: subj: Autobiographical memory Semantic memory Task analysis keyword: Episodic memory ab: We continue the process of investigating the probabilistic paired associate paradigm in an effort to understand the memory access control processes involved and to determine whether the memory structure produced is in transition between episodic and semantic memory. In this paradigm two targets are probabilistically paired with a cue across a large number of short lists. Participants can recall the target paired with the cue in the most recent list (list specific test), produce the first of the two targets that have been paired with that cue to come to mind (generalised test), and produce a free association response (semantic test). Switching between a generalised test and a list specific test did not produce a switching cost indicating a general similarity in the control processes involved. In addition, there was evidence for a dissociation between two different strength manipulations (amount of study time and number of cue-target pairings) such that number of pairings influenced the list specific, generalised and the semantic test but amount of study time only influenced the list specific and generalised test. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|