Analyzing Longitudinal Data With Missing Values.

Missing data methodology has improved dramatically in recent years, and popular computer programs now offer a variety of sophisticated options. Despite the widespread availability of theoretically justified methods, researchers in many disciplines still rely on subpar strategies that either eliminat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Rehabilitation Psychology Vol. 56; no. 4; pp. 267 - 289
Autor principal: Enders, Craig K.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Psychological Association November 2011
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Missing data methodology has improved dramatically in recent years, and popular computer programs now offer a variety of sophisticated options. Despite the widespread availability of theoretically justified methods, researchers in many disciplines still rely on subpar strategies that either eliminate incomplete cases or impute the missing scores with a single set of replacement values. This article provides readers with a nontechnical overview of some key issues from the missing data literature and demonstrates several of the techniques that methodologists currently recommend. This article begins by describing Rubin's missing data mechanisms. After a brief discussion of popular ad hoc approaches, the article provides a more detailed description of five analytic approaches that have received considerable attention in the missing data literature: maximum likelihood estimation, multiple imputation, the selection model, the shared parameter model, and the pattern mixture model. Finally, a series of data analysis examples illustrate the application of these methods. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.