The Exceptional Ethics of the Investigator-Subject Relationship.
This article concerns the validity of six canonical rules that institutional review boards use to constrain the behavior of investigators. These rules require investigators to design their studies in a scientifically valid way, not pay their subjects to take risks, minimize risks to their subjects,...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Medicine & Philosophy Vol. 35; no. 1; pp. 64 - 81 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Feb2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=52860255&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 52860255 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 03605310 MPS jtl: Journal of Medicine & Philosophy issn: 03605310 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Feb2010 vid: 35 iid: 1 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 52860255 10.1093/jmp/jhp055 ppf: 64 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 98KB tig: atl: The Exceptional Ethics of the Investigator-Subject Relationship. aug: au: SACHS, BENJAMIN affil: New York University, New York, New York, USA su: Ethics Exceptionalism (Political science) Research Rules Review committees sug: subj: Ethics Exceptionalism (Political science) Research Rules Review committees keyword: ethics exceptionalism investigator research rules ab: This article concerns the validity of six canonical rules that institutional review boards use to constrain the behavior of investigators. These rules require investigators to design their studies in a scientifically valid way, not pay their subjects to take risks, minimize risks to their subjects, secure for their subjects access to effective interventions post-trial, not pay their subjects too much and allow their subjects to withdraw from the study unconditionally. Enforcement of these rules is problematic because there are other relationships that seem to be like the investigator-subject relationship in all ethically relevant respects, such as the employer-employee and volunteer organizer-volunteer relationships, to which we would not dream of applying these same rules. Applying these rules in one context but not the others is a violation of ethical consistency I label “exceptionalism.” We should conclude that it is time to reexamine the validity of the six rules. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: © 2019 Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Inc.. item: Journal of Medicine & Philosophy holder: Oxford University Press / USA dt: @attributes: year: 2010 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|