The Reflective Epistemic Renegade.

Philosophers often find themselves in disagreement with contemporary philosophers they know full well to be their epistemic superiors on the topics relevant to the disagreement. This looks epistemically irresponsible. I offer a detailed investigation of this problem of the reflective epistemic reneg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy & Phenomenological Research Vol. 81; no. 2; pp. 419 - 464
Autor principal: FRANCES, BRYAN
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=53767652&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 53767652
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318205
        PPO
      jtl: Philosophy & Phenomenological Research
      issn: 00318205
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2010
      vid: 81
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        53767652
        10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00372.x
      ppf: 419
      ppct: 45
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 237KB
      tig:
        atl: The Reflective Epistemic Renegade.
      aug:
        au: FRANCES, BRYAN
        affil: Fordham University
      su:
        Epistemics
        Philosophers
        Virtue epistemology
        Skepticism
        Modality (Theory of knowledge)
      sug:
        subj:
          Epistemics
          Philosophers
          Virtue epistemology
          Skepticism
          Modality (Theory of knowledge)
      ab: Philosophers often find themselves in disagreement with contemporary philosophers they know full well to be their epistemic superiors on the topics relevant to the disagreement. This looks epistemically irresponsible. I offer a detailed investigation of this problem of the reflective epistemic renegade. I argue that although in some cases the renegade is not epistemically blameworthy, and the renegade situation is significantly less common than most would think, in a troublesome number of cases in which the situation arises the renegade is blameworthy in her disagreement with recognized epistemic superiors. I also offer some thoughts on what it would mean for philosophical practice for us to refrain from being renegades. Finally, I show how a new kind of radical skepticism emerges from modest theses regarding the renegade.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy & Phenomenological Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy & Phenomenological Research
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2010
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N