At the Intersection of Sovereignty and Biopolitics: The Di-Polaric Spatializations of Money.
The paper explores the incentive structures and the structurally rigid social hierarchies inherent in the polarizing logic of modern credit money and the mutual constitution of money's sovereign and biopolitical dimensions. It is argued that the monetary system constitutes a major transitory channel...
| Publicado en: | Foucault Studies no. 9; pp. 5 - 35 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Pennsylvania Press
Sep2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=53866485&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 53866485 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 18325203 1COW jtl: Foucault Studies issn: 18325203 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Sep2010 iid: 9 pid: 4636 pub: University of Pennsylvania Press artinfo: ui: 53866485 10.22439/fs.v0i9.3055 ppf: 5 ppct: 30 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 769KB tig: atl: At the Intersection of Sovereignty and Biopolitics: The Di-Polaric Spatializations of Money. aug: au: Auvinen, Tero affil: University of Lapland. su: Biopolitics (Sociobiology) Sociobiology Monetary systems Sovereignty Monetary policy sug: subj: Biopolitics (Sociobiology) Sociobiology Monetary systems Sovereignty Monetary policy keyword: biopolitics Foucault governmentality Money power ab: The paper explores the incentive structures and the structurally rigid social hierarchies inherent in the polarizing logic of modern credit money and the mutual constitution of money's sovereign and biopolitical dimensions. It is argued that the monetary system constitutes a major transitory channel for the logic of financial capital to transcend the limitations of sovereign spaces and to transform itself into a biopolitical force. The relationship between the material and the subjective — or the sovereign and the biopolitical — dimensions of money is seen as di-polaric rather than di-chotomic — as a mutually constitutive whole between relational dynamics and the normalizing opportunity structures which govern such interaction. If the sovereign and the biopolitical dimensions of money indeed constitute distinct but inseparable moments of the same totality, there would appear to be more room for strategic combination of heterogeneous analytical practices in emancipatory scholarship than what some of the traditional notions of the epistemological politics of power and sovereignty might suggest. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Foucault Studies is the property of University of Pennsylvania Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Foucault Studies holder: University of Pennsylvania Press dt: @attributes: year: 2010 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|