How to Make Bad Law: Lessons from Cyberspace Chris Reed How to Make Bad Law.

There is a clear trend for law and regulation, particularly in cyberspace, to become increasingly precisely specified. The perceived benefit of this approach, increased certainty as to compliance, may be illusory. Over-complex laws have serious disadvantages, particularly a greatly weakened normativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Modern Law Review Vol. 73; no. 6; pp. 903 - 933
Autor principal: Reed, Chris
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Nov2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=54591753&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 54591753
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00267961
        D8H
      jtl: Modern Law Review
      issn: 00267961
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2010
      vid: 73
      iid: 6
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        54591753
        10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00824.x
      ppf: 903
      ppct: 30
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 292KB
      tig:
        atl: How to Make Bad Law: Lessons from Cyberspace Chris Reed How to Make Bad Law.
      aug:
        au: Reed, Chris
        affil: Queen Mary University of London School of Law
      su:
        Internet laws
        Law & ethics
        Cyberspace
        Ethics
        Law reform
      sug:
        subj:
          Internet laws
          Law & ethics
          Cyberspace
          Ethics
          Law reform
      ab: There is a clear trend for law and regulation, particularly in cyberspace, to become increasingly precisely specified. The perceived benefit of this approach, increased certainty as to compliance, may be illusory. Over-complex laws have serious disadvantages, particularly a greatly weakened normative effect, and problems of contradiction and too-frequent amendment. The combined effect of these disadvantages can be to produce a 'bad' law system, assessed in terms of Fuller's internal morality of law. It may also result in a law-system which substantially fails to achieve its intended aims. This article proposes that these defects can be cured by abandoning the search for precision and substituting a method of lawmaking which requires the law's subjects to make their own qualitative assessments of whether they are meeting the obligations imposed on them. This will make the law more easily understandable by those to whom it applies, and will also increase the normative effect of cyberspace law.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Modern Law Review
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2010
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N