EVOLUTION: MIND OR RANDOMNESS?

Philosophical naturalists claim macroevolution shows order emerging by pure chance. This claim is incompatible with accepted physical and bio-logical principles. The present state of the universe is implicit in its initial state and the laws of nature. Logical principles essential to science require...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol. 22; no. 1/2; pp. 32 - 67
Autor principal: Polis, Dennis F.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Institute for Interdisciplinary Research 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=55601438&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 55601438
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08900132
        JYU
      jtl: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
      issn: 08900132
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2010
      vid: 22
      iid: 1/2
      pid: 2360
      pub: Institute for Interdisciplinary Research
    artinfo:
      ui:
        55601438
        10.5840/jis2010221/22
      ppf: 32
      ppct: 35
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 18.2MB
      tig:
        atl: EVOLUTION: MIND OR RANDOMNESS?
      aug:
        au: Polis, Dennis F.
        affil: University of Notre Dame
      su:
        Macroevolution
        Naturalists
        Science & law
        Theists
        Natural theology
        Conduct of life
      sug:
        subj:
          Macroevolution
          Naturalists
          Science & law
          Theists
          Natural theology
          Conduct of life
      ab: Philosophical naturalists claim macroevolution shows order emerging by pure chance. This claim is incompatible with accepted physical and bio-logical principles. The present state of the universe is implicit in its initial state and the laws of nature. Logical principles essential to science require these laws to be maintained by a self-conserving reality identifiable as God. Further, the laws share a common dynamic with human committed intentions. Both are logical propagators seen to be intentional by theists and naturalists alike. Mechanism and teleology project a single reality into different conceptual spaces. Statistically, evolution is only possible given predefined goals. For fitness to be explanatory, it must be prior to survival events, entailing immanent goals verified by convergent evolution, toolkit genes, and evolutionary stasis. Aristotle's falsifiable claims for teleology are confirmed by evolution. Evolution is not random, but fully intentional, evidencing mind in nature.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies is the property of Institute for Interdisciplinary Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
      holder: Institute for Interdisciplinary Research
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2010
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N