Is Frequentist Testing Vulnerable to the Base-Rate Fallacy?

This article calls into question the charge that frequentist testing is susceptible to the base-rate fallacy. It is argued that the apparent similarity between examples like the Harvard Medical School test and frequentist testing is highly misleading. A closer scrutiny reveals that such examples hav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 77; no. 4; pp. 565 - 584
Autor principal: Spanos, Aris
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Oct2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=55670632&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 55670632
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2010
      vid: 77
      iid: 4
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        55670632
        10.1086/656009
      ppf: 565
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1012KB
      tig:
        atl: Is Frequentist Testing Vulnerable to the Base-Rate Fallacy?
      aug:
        au: Spanos, Aris
        affil: Department of Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061
      su:
        Base rate fallacies
        Harvard Medical School
        Resemblance (Philosophy)
        Statistical sampling
        Statistical correlation
        Probability theory
      sug:
        subj:
          Base rate fallacies
          Harvard Medical School
          Resemblance (Philosophy)
          Statistical sampling
          Statistical correlation
          Probability theory
      ab: This article calls into question the charge that frequentist testing is susceptible to the base-rate fallacy. It is argued that the apparent similarity between examples like the Harvard Medical School test and frequentist testing is highly misleading. A closer scrutiny reveals that such examples have none of the basic features of a proper frequentist test, such as legitimate data, hypotheses, test statistics, and sampling distributions. Indeed, the relevant error probabilities are replaced with the false positive/negative rates that constitute deductive calculations based on known probabilities among events. As a result, the ampliative dimension of frequentist induction--learning from data about the underlying data-generating mechanism--is missing.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2010
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N