The Frankfurt School and the Social Conceptions of the Contemporary Petty-Bourgeois Left-Radical Movement.

The ideas and conceptions of the Frankfurt philosophical-sociological school, above all the "critical theory of society," the principles of "negative dialectics" and the "great refusal," the utopia of "pacified existence," occupy an important place in the contemporary ideological struggle between th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Russian Studies in Philosophy Vol. 24; no. 4; pp. 3 - 47
Autor principal: Bessonov, B. N.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Apr1986
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:The ideas and conceptions of the Frankfurt philosophical-sociological school, above all the "critical theory of society," the principles of "negative dialectics" and the "great refusal," the utopia of "pacified existence," occupy an important place in the contemporary ideological struggle between the world systems of socialism and capitalism, and comprise a significant ideological and theoretical arsenal of bourgeois ideology and revisionism. And this is not accidental. The "critical theory of society" formulated and argued for by T. Adorno, M. Horkheimer, H. Marcuse, J. Habermas, and others, which proclaims a protest against any social status quo, is used for the critique both of capitalism and actually existing socialism. At the same time it is also interpreted as an imaginary alternative to Marxism, and from, moreover, both right and "left" positions. Therefore the social theory of the Frankfurt school impacts upon the most diverse currents-from bourgeois social thought to the right and "left" varieties of revisionism. The complex evolution made by the representatives of this school in the last half-century contributed to this wide dissemination of the ideas of the Frankfurt school. (As a whole it was detrimental to progressive, democratic motifs, and intensified reactionary, antisocialist, and anticommunist tendencies.) Theoretical arguments are found in it both by those whose ideology, being directed to the progressive forces, is developed in the direction (sometimes inconsistently) of Marxism, and by those who fled the soil of Marxism and are hostile to it.