Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech.
Inner speech is typically characterized as either the activation of abstract linguistic representations or a detailed articulatory simulation that lacks only the production of sound. We present a study of the speech errors that occur during the inner recitation of tongue-twister-like phrases. Two fo...
| Publicado en: | Memory & Cognition Vol. 38; no. 8; pp. 1147 - 1161 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=57380865&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 57380865 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0090502X MEG jtl: Memory & Cognition issn: 0090502X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2010 vid: 38 iid: 8 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 57380865 10.3758/MC.38.8.1147 ppf: 1147 ppct: 14 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 321KB tig: atl: Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech. aug: au: OPPENHEIM, GARY M. DELL, GARY S. affil: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois su: Imagination Phonetics Psycholinguistics Speech Research funding Statistics Thought & thinking Verbal behavior Data analysis sug: subj: Imagination Phonetics Psycholinguistics Speech Research funding Statistics Thought & thinking Verbal behavior Data analysis ab: Inner speech is typically characterized as either the activation of abstract linguistic representations or a detailed articulatory simulation that lacks only the production of sound. We present a study of the speech errors that occur during the inner recitation of tongue-twister-like phrases. Two forms of inner speech were tested: inner speech without articulatory movements and articulated (mouthed) inner speech. Although mouthing one's inner speech could reasonably be assumed to require more articulatory planning, prominent theories assume that such planning should not affect the experience of inner speech and, consequently, the errors that are "heard" during its production. The errors occurring in articulated inner speech exhibited the phonemic similarity effect and the lexical bias effect--two speech-error phenomena that, in overt speech, have been localized to an articulatoryfeature- processing level and a lexical-phonological level, respectively In contrast, errors in unarticulated inner speech did not exhibit the phonemic similarity effect--just the lexical bias effect. The results are interpreted as support for a flexible abstraction account of inner speech. This conclusion has ramifications for the embodiment of language and speech and for the theories of speech production. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|