EU Obligation to the TRIPS Agreement: EU Microsoft Decision.
In Microsoft v. Commission, Microsoft was ordered by the European Court of First Instance (CFI) to license interface information to its competitors on reasonable terms and to supply a fully functioning version of Windows Personal Computer Operating System without Windows Media Player. Microsoft clai...
| Publicado en: | European Journal of International Law Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 997 - 1024 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Nov2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=57748132&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 57748132 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09385428 BHU jtl: European Journal of International Law issn: 09385428 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2010 vid: 21 iid: 4 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 57748132 10.1093/ejil/chq075 ppf: 997 ppct: 27 formats: tig: atl: EU Obligation to the TRIPS Agreement: EU Microsoft Decision. aug: au: Subramanian, Sujitha affil: Lecturer, Department of Law and Criminology, Aberystwyth University su: Court of First Instance of the European Communities Intellectual property -- International cooperation Microsoft Corp. Microsoft operating systems Restraint of trade International law sug: subj: Court of First Instance of the European Communities Intellectual property -- International cooperation Microsoft Corp. Microsoft operating systems Restraint of trade International law ab: In Microsoft v. Commission, Microsoft was ordered by the European Court of First Instance (CFI) to license interface information to its competitors on reasonable terms and to supply a fully functioning version of Windows Personal Computer Operating System without Windows Media Player. Microsoft claimed that the remedies infringed the minimum standards of IP protection provided by the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). However, the CFI refused to examine the TRIPS provisions, on the basis that international agreements do not prevail over primary Community law, and in any case, the TRIPS agreement permits members to restrain anti-competitive abuse of IP rights. This article examines the issues that arise from this position: first, is the Microsoft decision TRIPS compliant? Secondly, to what extent is the EU bound to its obligations under the TRIPS Agreement? The article highlights the lack of a clear-cut hierarchy of norms and illustrates how EU law is placed within a multi-layered governance structure involving national law and international law. The article finds that the EU does not engage in consistent interpretation or application of the TRIPS provisions. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2010 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|