What Happened to Balthasar Bekker in England? A Mystery in the History of Publishing.

This article looks at the fate of Balthasar Bekker's De Betoverde Weereld in England. The famous work opposing the earthly activity of evil spirits, rejecting the reality of witchcraft, and debunking spirit stories by suggesting natural causes for the supposed supernatural events, was published in A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Church History & Religious Culture Vol. 90; no. 4; pp. 609 - 632
Main Author: Fix, Andrew
Format: Article
Published: Brill Academic Publishers Dec2010
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=57829809&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 57829809
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1871241X
        1UW2
      jtl: Church History & Religious Culture
      issn: 1871241X
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2010
      vid: 90
      iid: 4
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        57829809
        10.1163/187124110X545182
      ppf: 609
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 240KB
      tig:
        atl: What Happened to Balthasar Bekker in England? A Mystery in the History of Publishing.
      aug:
        au: Fix, Andrew
        affil: Lafayette College, Easton, Pa. USA 18042-1768;, Email: fix.huygens.andy@gmail.com
      su:
        Bekker, Balthasar
        De Betoverde Weereld (Book)
        Demonology
        Publishing -- Social aspects
        Dunton, John, 1659-1733
        Devil
        Periodical publishing
        Witchcraft
        Faith & reason in Christianity
        Translations
      sug:
        subj:
          Bekker, Balthasar
          De Betoverde Weereld (Book)
          Demonology
          Publishing -- Social aspects
          Dunton, John, 1659-1733
          Devil
          Periodical publishing
          Witchcraft
          Faith & reason in Christianity
          Translations
      keyword:
        CONNECTIONS IN THE NETHERLANDS: RICHARD SAULT
        ENEMIES OF BEKKER: MELCHIOR LEYDEKER
        JOURNALS: THE ATHENIAN GAZETTE
        PHILOSOPHY: CARTESIANISM
        PUBLISHERS: JOHN DUNTON
        RICHARD BALDWIN
        SPIRIT ACTIVITY
        THE DEVIL
        THE POST MAN
        TRANSLATORS: PIERRE MOTTEAUX
      ab: This article looks at the fate of Balthasar Bekker's De Betoverde Weereld in England. The famous work opposing the earthly activity of evil spirits, rejecting the reality of witchcraft, and debunking spirit stories by suggesting natural causes for the supposed supernatural events, was published in Amsterdam (following a row with the original Leeuwarden publisher) by Anthony van Dale in 1692-1693 and caused an intense controversy. Bekker was a strict monotheist unwilling to hand over any of God's power to evil spirits or the Devil, an advocate of the accomodationist school of Scriptural interpretation that had landed Galileo in jail in 1633, a serious student of spirit 'superstition' with works such as those of Reginald Scot, Abraham Paling, and Anthony van Dale in his library. And he was a Cartesian: he owned Clauberg, Heereboord, Sylvain-Regis, etc. His opponents said that if one did not believe in evil spirits one could not believe in God. Bekker's book went through several Dutch printings, was right away translated into French and German, stirring reaction in those countries (the new book by Nooijen, Unserm Großen Bekker ein Denkmahl? looks at the German reaction). In England plans were afoot to translate the Betoverde Weereld by 1694, and Book I was translated and published. But that was all that got done. The highly controversial Book II and the final two books remained untranslated and unpublished. Why? Not for a lack of interest in evil spirits in England: witness the works of Glanvill, Henry More, George Sinclair, John Webster, and many others. Ghost stories were not lacking-just see the 'Devil of Tedworth' and 'Beckington Witch' stories. I argue the failure was a result of the vicissitudes of the London publishing industry, especially the relatively new periodical publishing, and of the eccentric, intellectual, but unfocussed general publisher John Dunton, who ruined himself and the Bekker project with his poor business sense (his wife ran the shop for him and when she died he was lost) which led him to travel to Dublin and Boston in search of publishable manuscripts (even on spirits!) instead of allowing him to concentrate his resources on Bekker. As a result, Bekker's work remained little known in the English-speaking world and its significance was almost totally overshadowed by the work of Locke. Would Daniel van Dalen, Jan ten Hoorn, or Willem Blaeu have made the same mistake? Also, Dunton put a goodly amount of his resources into the risky new periodical market and lost money that could have financed publication of the last three books of De Betoverde Weereld. Just because of the controversial nature of what he said, Bekker deserved better in England.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Church History & Religious Culture is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Church History & Religious Culture
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2010
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N