Miraculous Success? Inconsistency and Untruth in Kirchhoff’s Diffraction Theory.

Kirchhoff’s diffraction theory is introduced as a new case study in the realism debate. The theory is extremely successful despite being both inconsistent and not even approximately true. Some habitual realist proclamations simply cannot be maintained in the face of Kirchhoff’s theory, as the realis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Vol. 62; no. 1; pp. 29 - 47
Autores principales: Saatsi, Juha, Vickers, Peter
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Chicago Press Mar2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=57991239&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 57991239
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00070882
        BPL
      jtl: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00070882
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2011
      vid: 62
      iid: 1
      pid: 415
      pub: University of Chicago Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        57991239
        10.1093/bjps/axq008
      ppf: 29
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Miraculous Success? Inconsistency and Untruth in Kirchhoff’s Diffraction Theory.
      aug:
        au:
          Saatsi, Juha
          Vickers, Peter
        affil: Centre for History and Philosophy of Science, Department of Philosophy, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
      su:
        Optical diffraction
        Theory
        Realism
        Inconsistency (Logic)
        Diffraction patterns
      sug:
        subj:
          Optical diffraction
          Theory
          Realism
          Inconsistency (Logic)
          Diffraction patterns
      ab: Kirchhoff’s diffraction theory is introduced as a new case study in the realism debate. The theory is extremely successful despite being both inconsistent and not even approximately true. Some habitual realist proclamations simply cannot be maintained in the face of Kirchhoff’s theory, as the realist is forced to acknowledge that theoretical success can in some circumstances be explained in terms other than truth. The idiosyncrasy (or otherwise) of Kirchhoff’s case is considered. 1 Introduction2 The Naïve Optimist3 Kirchhoff’s Theory4 Inconsistency and Untruth in Kirchhoff’s Theory 4.1 The inconsistency puzzle4.2 The error-tolerance puzzle5 Ramifications for Realism6 Conclusion
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2011
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N