Darwin's Doubt Defended: Why Evolution Supports Skepticism.

Since the time of Charles Darwin, there has been concern that the theory of evolution provides fuel for skepticism. This paper presents new arguments that humanity's evolutionary origins are grounds for accepting that the universe is not as it appears to be to us. Firstly, it is argued that we shoul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Papers Vol. 40; no. 1; pp. 81 - 104
Autor principal: Littmann, Greg
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Mar2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=58667642&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 58667642
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        05568641
        273E
      jtl: Philosophical Papers
      issn: 05568641
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2011
      vid: 40
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        58667642
        10.1080/05568641.2011.560028
      ppf: 81
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 153KB
      tig:
        atl: Darwin's Doubt Defended: Why Evolution Supports Skepticism.
      aug:
        au: Littmann, Greg
        affil: Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville
      su:
        Darwin, Charles, 1809-1882
        Human evolution
        Human origins
        Human behavior
        Skepticism
        Universe
      sug:
        subj:
          Darwin, Charles, 1809-1882
          Human evolution
          Human origins
          Human behavior
          Skepticism
          Universe
      ab: Since the time of Charles Darwin, there has been concern that the theory of evolution provides fuel for skepticism. This paper presents new arguments that humanity's evolutionary origins are grounds for accepting that the universe is not as it appears to be to us. Firstly, it is argued that we should expect to have an incomplete capacity to comprehend the universe: both the mental limitations of all non-human life and the narrow interests of most humans provide evidence for this. Secondly, it is argued that we should expect the universe as it appears to us to have nothing more than a relationship of correlation to the universe as it actually is: both simplicity and the huge number of ways in which the universe may be represented provide reason for evolution to produce such a correlative system.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophical Papers is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophical Papers
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2011
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N