A Non-Newtonian Newtonian Model of Evolution: The ZFEL View.

Recently philosophers of biology have argued over whether or not Newtonian mechanics provides a useful analogy for thinking about evolutionary theory. For philosophers, the canonical presentation of this analogy is Sober's. Matthen and Ariew and Walsh, Lewins, and Ariew argue that this analogy is de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 77; no. 5; pp. 702 - 716
Autor principal: Brandon, Robert N.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Dec2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=59159594&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 59159594
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2010
      vid: 77
      iid: 5
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        59159594
        10.1086/656901
      ppf: 702
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 6.6MB
      tig:
        atl: A Non-Newtonian Newtonian Model of Evolution: The ZFEL View.
      aug:
        au: Brandon, Robert N.
        affil: Departments of Philosophy and Biology, Duke University, 201 West Duke Building, Durham, NC 27708
      su:
        Mechanics (Physics)
        Evolutionary theories
        Philosophy of biology
        Analogy
        Theory of knowledge
      sug:
        subj:
          Mechanics (Physics)
          Evolutionary theories
          Philosophy of biology
          Analogy
          Theory of knowledge
      ab: Recently philosophers of biology have argued over whether or not Newtonian mechanics provides a useful analogy for thinking about evolutionary theory. For philosophers, the canonical presentation of this analogy is Sober's. Matthen and Ariew and Walsh, Lewins, and Ariew argue that this analogy is deeply wrong-headed. Here I argue that the analogy is indeed useful, however, not in the way it is usually interpreted. The Newtonian analogy depends on having the proper analogue of Newton's First Law. That analogue is what McShea and Brandon call the Zero Force Evolutionary Law (ZFEL). According to the ZFEL, change, not stasis, is the default state of evolutionary systems.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2010
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N