Endurantist and perdurantist accounts of persistence.

In this paper, I focus on three issues intertwined in current debates between endurantists and perdurantists-(i) the dimension of persisting objects, (ii) whether persisting objects have timeless, or only time-relative, parts, and (iii) whether persisting objects have proper temporal parts. I argue...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 154; no. 1; pp. 27 - 52
Autor principal: Donnelly, Maureen
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature May2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=60017153&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 60017153
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2011
      vid: 154
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        60017153
        10.1007/s11098-010-9526-z
      ppf: 27
      ppct: 25
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 350KB
      tig:
        atl: Endurantist and perdurantist accounts of persistence.
      aug:
        au: Donnelly, Maureen
        affil: Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo, 135 Park Hall Buffalo 14260 USA
      su:
        Perdurantism & endurantism (Philosophy)
        Debate
        Questioning
        Belief & doubt
        Theory of knowledge
      sug:
        subj:
          Perdurantism & endurantism (Philosophy)
          Debate
          Questioning
          Belief & doubt
          Theory of knowledge
      keyword:
        Endurantism
        Four-dimensionalism
        Parthood
        Perdurantism
        Persistence
        Temporal parts
        Three-dimensionalism
      ab: In this paper, I focus on three issues intertwined in current debates between endurantists and perdurantists-(i) the dimension of persisting objects, (ii) whether persisting objects have timeless, or only time-relative, parts, and (iii) whether persisting objects have proper temporal parts. I argue that one standard endurantist position on the first issue is compatible with standard perdurantist positions on parthood and temporal parts. I further argue that different accounts of persistence depend on the claims about objects' dimensions and not on the auxiliary claims about parthood and temporal parts.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2011. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2011
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N