God − Moore = Ramsey (A Reply to Chalmers and Hájek).

Famously, Frank P. Ramsey suggested a test for the acceptability of conditionals. Recently, David Chalmers and Alan Hájek (2007) have criticized a qualitative variant of the Ramsey test for indicative conditionals. In this paper we argue for the following three claims: (i) Chalmers and Hájek are rig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 47 - 52
Autor principal: Leitgeb, Hannes
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Apr2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=60116935&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 60116935
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01677411
        NM2
      jtl: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy
      issn: 01677411
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2011
      vid: 30
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        60116935
        10.1007/s11245-010-9088-x
      ppf: 47
      ppct: 5
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 213KB
      tig:
        atl: God − Moore = Ramsey (A Reply to Chalmers and Hájek).
      aug:
        au: Leitgeb, Hannes
        affil: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Fakultät für Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft, Lehrstuhl für Logik und Sprachphilosophie Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1 80539 München Germany
      su:
        Ramsey, Frank P.
        Chalmers, David
        Test interpretation
        Conditionals (Logic)
        Qualitative psychological research
        Hermeneutics
      sug:
        subj:
          Ramsey, Frank P.
          Chalmers, David
          Test interpretation
          Conditionals (Logic)
          Qualitative psychological research
          Hermeneutics
      keyword:
        Conditionals
        Introspection
        Moore
        Ramsey test
      ab: Famously, Frank P. Ramsey suggested a test for the acceptability of conditionals. Recently, David Chalmers and Alan Hájek (2007) have criticized a qualitative variant of the Ramsey test for indicative conditionals. In this paper we argue for the following three claims: (i) Chalmers and Hájek are right that the variant of the Ramsey test that they attack is not the correct way of spelling out an acceptability test for indicative conditionals. But there is a suppositional variant of the Ramsey test which is still stated in purely qualitative terms, which avoids the problems, and which looks correct. (ii) While the variant of the Ramsey test that Chalmers and Hájek criticize is not correct, it is still a good approximation of a correct formulation of the Ramsey test which may be usefully employed in various contexts. (iii) The variant of the Ramsey test that Chalmers and Hájek suggest as a substitute for the deficient version of the Ramsey test is itself subject to worries similar to those raised by Chalmers and Hájek, if it is given a non-suppositional interpretation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, 2011. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2011
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N