'STANDING APART IN THE SHELTER OF THE CITY WALL': THE CONTEMPLATIVE IDEAL VS. THE POLITICALLY ENGAGED PHILOSOPHER IN PLATO'S POLITICAL THEORY.

Natural philosophers seem to have good reasons to prefer that the kallipolis, the maximally just community of the Republic, is never realized. If such a community is realized, philosophers are under the obligation of a just demand that they govern. However, a life that contains governance as a signi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Southern Journal of Philosophy Vol. 48; no. 2; pp. 197 - 217
Autor principal: McKeen, Catherine
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Summer2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=60602977&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 60602977
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00384283
        2GW
      jtl: Southern Journal of Philosophy
      issn: 00384283
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Summer2010
      vid: 48
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        60602977
        10.1111/j.2041-6962.2010.01013.x
      ppf: 197
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 109KB
      tig:
        atl: 'STANDING APART IN THE SHELTER OF THE CITY WALL': THE CONTEMPLATIVE IDEAL VS. THE POLITICALLY ENGAGED PHILOSOPHER IN PLATO'S POLITICAL THEORY.
      aug:
        au: McKeen, Catherine
        affil: Rutgers University
      su:
        Philosophers
        Political science
        Contemplation
        Ethics
        Philosophy
      sug:
        subj:
          Philosophers
          Political science
          Contemplation
          Ethics
          Philosophy
      ab: Natural philosophers seem to have good reasons to prefer that the kallipolis, the maximally just community of the Republic, is never realized. If such a community is realized, philosophers are under the obligation of a just demand that they govern. However, a life that contains governance as a significant part is not the happiest life a philosopher can live. The happiest life for a philosopher is one consisting entirely or largely in philosophical contemplation. I confront this puzzle by arguing that natural philosophers gain benefits in the kallipolis that are not available to them in other communities, primarily opportunities for correction and punishment. While other communities may offer philosophers more opportunities for philosophical contemplation, these communities do not provide a reliable mechanism for counteracting potentially dangerous moral blindness. In contrast to other communities, the kallipolis institutionalizes and reliably replicates the structures necessary for counteracting moral blindness.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Southern Journal of Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Southern Journal of Philosophy
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2010
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N