SHORT-RUN AND LONG-RUN IMPLICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE.

Opposing theoretical arguments exist regarding the effect of environmental regulation on financial performance. Some studies argue that environmental regulation constrains firms' abilities to exploit revenue-enhancing or cost-reducing opportunities. Other studies, representing the Porter hypothesis,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Contemporary Economic Policy Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 357 - 374
Autores principales: RASSIER, DYLAN G., EARNHART, DIETRICH
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jul2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=61811407&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 61811407
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10743529
        CEY
      jtl: Contemporary Economic Policy
      issn: 10743529
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2011
      vid: 29
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        61811407
        10.1111/j.1465-7287.2010.00237.x
      ppf: 357
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 554KB
      tig:
        atl: SHORT-RUN AND LONG-RUN IMPLICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE.
      aug:
        au:
          RASSIER, DYLAN G.
          EARNHART, DIETRICH
        affil:
          Rassier: Research Economist, Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce, BE-40, Washington, DC 20230. Phone 202-606-9892, Fax 202-606-5366, E-mail
          Earnhart: Professor, Department of Economics, University of Kansas, 435 Snow Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045. Phone 785-864-2866, Fax 785-864-5270, E-mail
      su:
        Environmental regulations
        Government business enterprises
        Financial performance
        Business revenue
        Cost control
        Hypothesis
        Chemical industry
        Industrial wastes
      sug:
        subj:
          Environmental regulations
          Government business enterprises
          Cyclic Crude, Intermediate, and Gum and Wood Chemical Manufacturing
          All Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing
          Chemical (except agricultural) and allied product merchant wholesalers
          Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers
          Waste treatment and disposal
          Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal
          Administration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management Programs
          Financial performance
          Business revenue
          Cost control
          Hypothesis
          Chemical industry
          Industrial wastes
      ab: Opposing theoretical arguments exist regarding the effect of environmental regulation on financial performance. Some studies argue that environmental regulation constrains firms' abilities to exploit revenue-enhancing or cost-reducing opportunities. Other studies, representing the Porter hypothesis, argue that environmental regulation motivates firms to innovate, which ultimately improves financial performance. Although much of the debate focuses on long-run effects, there are also important short-run effects. This study provides empirical evidence regarding the short-run and long-run effects of Clean Water Act regulation on financial performance. To generate this evidence, we examine the effect of permitted wastewater discharge limits, on the return on sales, using panel data on publicly owned firms in the chemical manufacturing industries. We find that Clean Water Act regulation improves financial performance in both the short run and the long run with a stronger effect in the long run. These results suggest that some net benefits may be realized during a short-run transition to comply with a tighter permitted discharge limit, with additional benefits accruing to the firm in the long run because the firm has more time to innovate. ( JEL K23, L25, L51, L65, Q52)
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N