Optimal Sampling Strategies for Validation Studies.

In selection instrument validation studies the situation occasionally arises in which there are a large number of observations on the predictor but criterion data are very expensive or difficult to obtain, thus making it necessary to sample values of the predictor. Three strategies (random, rectangu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Applied Psychology Vol. 63; no. 5; pp. 602 - 609
Autores principales: Osburn, H.G., Greener, Jack M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Psychological Association Oct78
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=6239205&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 6239205
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00219010
        JAY
      jtl: Journal of Applied Psychology
      issn: 00219010
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct78
      vid: 63
      iid: 5
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        6239205
        10.1037/0021-9010.63.5.602
      ppf: 602
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Optimal Sampling Strategies for Validation Studies.
      aug:
        au:
          Osburn, H.G.
          Greener, Jack M.
        affil: University of Houston
      su:
        Statistical sampling
        Analysis of variance
        Sampling (Process)
        Decision making
        Criterion (Theory of knowledge)
        Heteroscedasticity
      sug:
        subj:
          Statistical sampling
          Analysis of variance
          Sampling (Process)
          Decision making
          Criterion (Theory of knowledge)
          Heteroscedasticity
      ab: In selection instrument validation studies the situation occasionally arises in which there are a large number of observations on the predictor but criterion data are very expensive or difficult to obtain, thus making it necessary to sample values of the predictor. Three strategies (random, rectangular, and extreme groups) for sampling predictor values were compared with respect to accuracy and statistical power in estimating the total group validity. Comparisons were made on samples drawn from six large N (approximately 10,000) bivariate test score distributions known to contain some departures from linearity and homoscedasticity. It was shown that in this situation selecting values of the predictor that form a rectangular distribution gave, in all instances studied, at least equal accuracy and greater statistical power in estimating the total group validity compared with random sampling. When the predictor-criterion relationship was generally linear with only modest departures from linearity, selecting values from the extremes of the predictor distribution was optimal in terms of accuracy and statistical power and clearly superior to rectangular sampling.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1978
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N