Exploratory Comparative Study of Four Job Analysis Methods.
Compares job analysis methods namely, job elements, critical incidents, the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ) and task analysis to assess their utility for personnel selection. Quantification of exam plan contents for separate analysis; Evaluation on the use of PAQ; Impact of the methods on exa...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Applied Psychology Vol. 65; no. 5; pp. 524 - 536 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
Oct80
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=6239256&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 6239256 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00219010 JAY jtl: Journal of Applied Psychology issn: 00219010 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct80 vid: 65 iid: 5 pid: 34 pub: American Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 6239256 10.1037/0021-9010.65.5.524 ppf: 524 ppct: 12 formats: tig: atl: Exploratory Comparative Study of Four Job Analysis Methods. aug: au: Levine, Edward L. Ash, Ronald A. Bennett, Nell su: Job analysis Task analysis Employee selection Examinations sug: subj: Job analysis Task analysis Employee selection Examinations ab: Compares job analysis methods namely, job elements, critical incidents, the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ) and task analysis to assess their utility for personnel selection. Quantification of exam plan contents for separate analysis; Evaluation on the use of PAQ; Impact of the methods on exam plan contents or the costs of developing exam plans. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 1980 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|