Why Concurrent Objects Are Recurrently Complicated.
A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article in the March 2011 issue entitled "Data Structures in the Multicore Age" by Nir Shavit.
| Publicado en: | Communications of the ACM Vol. 54; no. 6; p. 6 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Letter |
| Publicado: |
Association for Computing Machinery
Jun2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=63231714&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 63231714 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00010782 ACM jtl: Communications of the ACM issn: 00010782 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2011 vid: 54 iid: 6 pid: 68 pub: Association for Computing Machinery artinfo: ui: 63231714 10.1145/1953122.1953124 ppf: 6 ppct: 0 formats: tig: atl: Why Concurrent Objects Are Recurrently Complicated. aug: au: Skudlarek, Joseph P. su: Letters to the editor Data structures Pseudocode (Computer program language) sug: subj: Letters to the editor Data structures Pseudocode (Computer program language) ab: A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article in the March 2011 issue entitled "Data Structures in the Multicore Age" by Nir Shavit. pubtype: Periodical doctype: Letter src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2011 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|