Evaluating the Incremental Value of New Biomarkers With Integrated Discrimination Improvement.
The integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index is a popular tool for evaluating the capacity of a marker to predict a binary outcome of interest. Recent reports have proposed that the IDI is more sensitive than other metrics for identifying useful predictive markers. In this article, the auth...
| Published in: | American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 174; no. 3; pp. 364 - 375 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Aug2011
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=63305954&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 63305954 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00029262 1X1 jtl: American Journal of Epidemiology issn: 00029262 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2011 vid: 174 iid: 3 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 63305954 104663669 104663669 10.1093/aje/kwr086 63305954 ppf: 364 ppct: 11 formats: tig: atl: Evaluating the Incremental Value of New Biomarkers With Integrated Discrimination Improvement. aug: au: Kerr, Kathleen F. McClelland, Robyn L. Brown, Elizabeth R. Lumley, Thomas sug: subj: Biological Markers Discriminant Validity Predictive Validity Sensitivity and Specificity Evaluation Human Funding Source Epidemiological Research Methods Computer Simulation Utilization Null Hypothesis Validation Studies Data Analysis, Statistical Methods Type I Error Odds Ratio Logistic Regression Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission Sampling Error ab: The integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index is a popular tool for evaluating the capacity of a marker to predict a binary outcome of interest. Recent reports have proposed that the IDI is more sensitive than other metrics for identifying useful predictive markers. In this article, the authors use simulated data sets and theoretical analysis to investigate the statistical properties of the IDI. The authors consider the common situation in which a risk model is fitted to a data set with and without the new, candidate predictor(s). Results demonstrate that the published method of estimating the standard error of an IDI estimate tends to underestimate the error. The z test proposed in the literature for IDI-based testing of a new biomarker is not valid, because the null distribution of the test statistic is not standard normal, even in large samples. If a test for the incremental value of a marker is desired, the authors recommend the test based on the model. For investigators who find the IDI to be a useful measure, bootstrap methods may offer a reasonable option for inference when evaluating new predictors, as long as the added predictive capacity is large. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|