Mass–Energy–Momentum: Only there Because of Spacetime?

I describe how relativistic field theory generalizes the paradigm property of material systems, the possession of mass, to the requirement that they have a mass–energy–momentum density tensor Tμν associated with them. I argue that Tμν does not represent an intrinsic property of matter. For it will b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Vol. 62; no. 3; pp. 453 - 489
Autor principal: Lehmkuhl, Dennis
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Chicago Press Sep2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=64113013&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 64113013
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00070882
        BPL
      jtl: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00070882
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2011
      vid: 62
      iid: 3
      pid: 415
      pub: University of Chicago Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        64113013
        10.1093/bjps/axr003
      ppf: 453
      ppct: 36
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Mass–Energy–Momentum: Only there Because of Spacetime?
      aug:
        au: Lehmkuhl, Dennis
        affil: Oriel College, Oxford University; and IZWT, University of Wuppertal dennis.lehmkuhl@uni-wuppertal.de
      su:
        Field theory (Physics)
        Special relativity (Physics)
        Momentum (Mechanics)
        Relativistic quantum theory
        Metaphysics
        Calculus of tensors
      sug:
        subj:
          Field theory (Physics)
          Special relativity (Physics)
          Momentum (Mechanics)
          Relativistic quantum theory
          Metaphysics
          Calculus of tensors
      ab: I describe how relativistic field theory generalizes the paradigm property of material systems, the possession of mass, to the requirement that they have a mass–energy–momentum density tensor Tμν associated with them. I argue that Tμν does not represent an intrinsic property of matter. For it will become evident that the definition of Tμν depends on the metric field gμν in a variety of ways. Accordingly, since gμν represents the geometry of spacetime itself, the properties of mass, stress, energy, and momentum should not be seen as intrinsic properties of matter, but as relational properties that material systems have only in virtue of their relation to spacetime structure. 1 Introduction2 The Concept of Matter in Relativistic Field Theory 2.1 A short history of energy–momentum tensors 2.2 Metaphysical matters3 Explicit Dependence of Energy Tensors on the Metric Field4 Metric Dependence in Lagrangian Theories 4.1 The basic ideas of Lagrangian field theory 4.2 Enter the energy tensor 4.3 Different kinds of coupling5 Metric Dependence in General 5.1 Definitional dependence at the level of the matter fields 5.2 Definitional dependence at the level of conditions on the energy tensor 5.3 Abstract definitional dependence 5.4 Interpretational dependence6 What Kind of Property is Mass–Energy–Momentum Density? 6.1 A relational property? 6.2 Relational and essential?7 Conclusion
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2011
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N