Leibniz's Concept of Substance and his Reception of John Calvin's Doctrine of the Eucharist.

Leibniz saw the question of the eucharist as a crucial stumbling block to the agreement between Lutherans and Calvinists. Mandated together with Daniel Ernst Jablonsky to prepare working documents for the negotiations between Hanover and Brandenburg in 1697, Leibniz carefully read through the Calvin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal for the History of Philosophy Vol. 19; no. 5; pp. 917 - 934
Autor principal: Backus, Irena
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Sep2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=65143517&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 65143517
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09608788
        5AX
      jtl: British Journal for the History of Philosophy
      issn: 09608788
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2011
      vid: 19
      iid: 5
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        65143517
        10.1080/09608788.2011.599569
      ppf: 917
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 144KB
      tig:
        atl: Leibniz's Concept of Substance and his Reception of John Calvin's Doctrine of the Eucharist.
      aug:
        au: Backus, Irena
        affil: Institut d'histoire de la Réformation, Université de Genève
      su:
        Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Freiherr von, 1646-1716
        Lord's Supper
        Lutherans
        Calvinism
        Protestant history
        Ontology
        Lord's Supper & Christian union
        History
      sug:
        subj:
          Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Freiherr von, 1646-1716
          Lord's Supper
          Lutherans
          Calvinism
          Protestant history
          Ontology
          Lord's Supper & Christian union
          History
      keyword:
        Calvin
        eucharist
        Leibniz
        Lutheranism
        ontology
        religious agreement
        Unvorgreiffliches Bedencken
      ab: Leibniz saw the question of the eucharist as a crucial stumbling block to the agreement between Lutherans and Calvinists. Mandated together with Daniel Ernst Jablonsky to prepare working documents for the negotiations between Hanover and Brandenburg in 1697, Leibniz carefully read through the Calvinist Confessions of faith and the works of Calvin in their 1671 edition. He made an extensive collection of excerpts from the Confessions of faith and from Calvin's Institutes all intended to show that Calvinists admitted the substantial presence of Christ's body in the eucharist. (This collection of excerpts is analysed here for the first time and compared with another little-known document, the Unvorgreiffliches Bedencken). L. had argued previously in 1691/92 that, contrary to the assertions of Pellisson-Fontanier, his own conception of substance and of Christ's presence in the eucharist was completely different from Calvin's. However, by 1697, it was clear to Leibniz that Calvin's concept of substance, which was broadly speaking Aristotelian, was never defined clearly by the reformer, and could be made to coincide with Leibniz's own notion of substance as force rather than substance in its dimensional sense. At the same time L. dissociated Ubiquitarianism (doctrine characteristic of late sixteenth century Lutheranism, which defended the dimensional presence of Christ's body in heaven and in the eucharist, by arguing that Christ in his divine nature could cause his physical body to be present in several places at the same time) from Lutheranism. He also drove a wedge between the doctrines of Zwingli and Calvin. L. thus attempted to find religious union on a common ontology and he might well have succeeded if it were not for complex political circumstances, which ultimately caused the failure of the negotiations.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of British Journal for the History of Philosophy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: British Journal for the History of Philosophy
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2011
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N