Articulating Animals: Animals and Implicit Inferences in Bramdom's Work.

Brandom denies animals implicit reasoning by emphasizing their inability to make inferences explicit, and in so doing, denigrates animals by likening their behavior to that of machines and artifacts. With disturbing regularity and ease, Brandom equates pigeons and parrots to machines and thermostats...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Between the Species: A Journal for the Study of Philosophy & Animals Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 40 - 57
Autor principal: Musser, Joel D.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Between the Species 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=67517625&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 67517625
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        19458487
        1GN1
      jtl: Between the Species: A Journal for the Study of Philosophy & Animals
      issn: 19458487
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2011
      vid: 14
      iid: 1
      pid: 26472
      pub: Between the Species
    artinfo:
      ui:
        67517625
        10.15368/bts.2011v14n1.4
      ppf: 40
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 192KB
      tig:
        atl: Articulating Animals: Animals and Implicit Inferences in Bramdom's Work.
      aug:
        au: Musser, Joel D.
        affil: Louisiana State University
      su:
        Animal behavior
        Inference (Logic)
        Pigeons
        Human beings
        Analogy
        Expressionism (Philosophy)
        Antiquities
        Machinery
      sug:
        subj:
          Animal behavior
          Inference (Logic)
          Pigeons
          Human beings
          Analogy
          Expressionism (Philosophy)
          Antiquities
          Machinery
      ab: Brandom denies animals implicit reasoning by emphasizing their inability to make inferences explicit, and in so doing, denigrates animals by likening their behavior to that of machines and artifacts. With disturbing regularity and ease, Brandom equates pigeons and parrots to machines and thermostats in their inability to express implicit/explicit inferences: neither the pigeon nor the machine can "provid[e] reasons for making other moves in the language game." I contest, however, that animals are paradigmatically more than any similarity or analogy to mechanical processing, just as humans are paradigmatically more than any reductive analogy to animals. The human/animal distinction need not come at the cost of ignoring the difference between animals and artifacts, and I believe we can largely subscribe to Brandom's differentiation of the human in terms of expressionism if we allow that animals can make implicit inferences without making them explicit.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Between the Species: A Journal for the Study of Philosophy & Animals is the property of Between the Species and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Between the Species: A Journal for the Study of Philosophy & Animals
      holder: Between the Species
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2011
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N