TRANSDISCIPLlNINIS PROJEKTAS: PROVERŽIS Į MOKSLŲ IR PRAKTIKOS SINTEZĘ?
The second half of the 20th century witnessed discontent with rigid distinction between science specializations, thus science integration processes which can be described in terms of multi, poli, pliurali, inter, transdisciplinary started to evolve. The article attempts to show that the internationa...
| Published in: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 80; pp. 107 - 116 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Vilnius University
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=67616517&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 67616517 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2011 vid: 80 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 67616517 10.15388/Problemos.2011.0.1304 ppf: 107 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 564KB tig: atl: TRANSDISCIPLlNINIS PROJEKTAS: PROVERŽIS Į MOKSLŲ IR PRAKTIKOS SINTEZĘ? aug: au: Kanišauskas, Saulius affil: Mykolo Romerio universiteto, Filosofijos katedra, Ateities g. 20, LT-08303 Vilnius su: Theory of knowledge Problem solving Integration (Theory of knowledge) Heuristic algorithms Ontology sug: subj: Theory of knowledge Problem solving Integration (Theory of knowledge) Heuristic algorithms Ontology keyword: dalykai discipline disciplinos mokslas science subjects transdisciplinary discourse transdisciplininis diskursas transgresija transgression dalykai disciplinos mokslas transdisciplininis diskursas transgresija ab: The second half of the 20th century witnessed discontent with rigid distinction between science specializations, thus science integration processes which can be described in terms of multi, poli, pliurali, inter, transdisciplinary started to evolve. The article attempts to show that the international term "discipline" has a significantly broader meaning than the Lithuanian term "subject", which is perceived as a branch or field of science. It is maintained that the vulnerability degree of "disciplinary purity" should be the most important criterion which allows defining relation types of disciplines. However, conversely to other types of disciplinary integration, the transdisciplinary project rejects the requirement of "disciplinary purity" in principle. Moreover, the transdisciplinary project is first associated with striving to direct the academic science that it could satisfy the pragmatic social needs through introduction of non-academic factors. Also, the article points out that the "strong version" of the transdiciplinary project which focuses on the need to delve into fundamental questions of worldview and which attempts to consolidate all sciences faces serious ontological and epistemological problems. As a result, there is considerable danger that due to not solved epistemological problems, the transdisciplinary project is at risk to remain of apologetic character and a source of heuristics. Antrojoje XX amžiaus pusėje prasidėjo mokslo sričių (disciplinų, dalykų) integracijos procesai, apibūdinami multi-, poli-, pliurali-, inter-, tarp-, trans- discipliniškumo terminais. Parodoma, kad tarptautinis terminas „disciplina" turi kur kas platesnę prasmę nei lietuviškas terminas „dalykas", suprantamas kaip mokslo šaka ar sritis. Teigiama, kad svarbiausiu kriterijumi, leidžiančiu apibūdinti disciplinų sąveikų tipus, turi būti „disciplininio grynumo" pažeidimo laipsnis, o transdisciplininis projektas, skirtingai nei kiti disciplinų integracijos tipai, „disciplininio grynumo" reikalavimą atmeta iš principo. Parodoma, kad transdisciplininis projektas pirmiausia siejamas su siekiu akademinį mokslą orientuoti į pragmatinį socialinių reikmių tenkinimą, į jį įtraukiant neakademinius veiksnius. Atkreipiamas dėmesys į tai, kad stiprioji transdisciplininio diskurso versija, kuri pabrėžia poreikį gilintis į fundamentalius pasaulėvaizdžio klausimus ir siekia suvienyti visus mokslus, susiduria su rimtomis ontologinėmis bei epistemologinėmis problemomis. Išsakomas nuogąstavimas, kad dėl jų transdisciplininis projektas gali likti apologetinio pobūdžio ar tik euristikos šaltiniu. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2011 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|