Development Effectiveness and the Politics of Commitment.

International aid agencies have experienced a ‘political turn’ over the past decade, with political economy analyses becoming increasingly numerous as a means to drive development effectiveness. Yet aid agencies have so far failed to shift their aid modalities in response. The problem lies in an ina...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Third World Quarterly Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 17 - 37
Main Authors: Hughes, Caroline, Hutchison, Jane
Format: Case Study
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd Feb2012
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=69700080&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 69700080
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01436597
        TWQ
      jtl: Third World Quarterly
      issn: 01436597
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2012
      vid: 33
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        69700080
        10.1080/01436597.2012.627229
      ppf: 17
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 132KB
      tig:
        atl: Development Effectiveness and the Politics of Commitment.
      aug:
        au:
          Hughes, Caroline
          Hutchison, Jane
      su:
        International economic assistance
        International relations
        Intervention (International law)
        Philippines
        Cambodia
      sug:
        subj:
          Philippines
          Cambodia
          International economic assistance
          International relations
          Intervention (International law)
      ab: International aid agencies have experienced a ‘political turn’ over the past decade, with political economy analyses becoming increasingly numerous as a means to drive development effectiveness. Yet aid agencies have so far failed to shift their aid modalities in response. The problem lies in an inadequate conceptualisation of ‘politics’. Most donors continue to see development as a public good, rather than as the focus of contestation in a context of societal struggle, and consequently fail to take oppositional forces sufficiently seriously. This facilitates the misapplication of terms such as ‘partnership’ and ‘ownership’, contributing to failures in efforts to promote reform. A more truly political analysis of aid intervention entails two innovations: the use of structural analysis to distinguish between interests in reform; and the use of this distinction, in turn, to inform the practice of taking sides in political struggles. Case studies of international aid programmes in Cambodia and the Philippines illustrate how the failure of donors to take sides with particular reformers has resulted in lost opportunities to achieve concrete outcomes from development projects.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Case Study
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Third World Quarterly is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Third World Quarterly
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2012
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N