Time Travel: Why It May Not Pay to Work out All the Kinks.

Here, we hypothesize that a smooth nongeodesic closed timelike curve is never most efficient with respect to total acceleration if a kink is permitted at the initial (terminal) point. We support our hypothesis in a variety of ways. Most notably, we show Malament's opposing conjecture concerning Göde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 78; no. 5; pp. 1037 - 1046
Autor principal: Manchak, John Byron
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Dec2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=70256701&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 70256701
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2011
      vid: 78
      iid: 5
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        70256701
        10.1086/662254
      ppf: 1037
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 190KB
      tig:
        atl: Time Travel: Why It May Not Pay to Work out All the Kinks.
      aug:
        au: Manchak, John Byron
        affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
      su:
        Spacetime
        Time travel
        G-spaces
        Philosophy of science
        Gödel's theorem
      sug:
        subj:
          Spacetime
          Time travel
          G-spaces
          Philosophy of science
          Gödel's theorem
      ab: Here, we hypothesize that a smooth nongeodesic closed timelike curve is never most efficient with respect to total acceleration if a kink is permitted at the initial (terminal) point. We support our hypothesis in a variety of ways. Most notably, we show Malament's opposing conjecture concerning Gödel space-time to be false.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2011
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N