Confirmation and Chaos.

Suggests that the concern shown by Rueger and Sharp (1996) and Koperski (19980 that certain procedural accounts of model confirmation are compromised by non-linear dynamics are better approached by considering whether chaotic data analysis methods allow for reliable inference from data. Framework a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 69; no. 2; pp. 256 - 266
Autores principales: Harrell, Maralee, Glymour, Clark
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Jun2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=7047241&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 7047241
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2002
      vid: 69
      iid: 2
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        7047241
        10.1086/341052
      ppf: 256
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.1MB
      tig:
        atl: Confirmation and Chaos.
      aug:
        au:
          Harrell, Maralee
          Glymour, Clark
      su:
        Confirmation (Logic)
        Chaos theory
        Simulation methods & models
        Methodology
        Nonlinear systems
      sug:
        subj:
          Confirmation (Logic)
          Chaos theory
          Simulation methods & models
          Methodology
          Nonlinear systems
      ab: Suggests that the concern shown by Rueger and Sharp (1996) and Koperski (19980 that certain procedural accounts of model confirmation are compromised by non-linear dynamics are better approached by considering whether chaotic data analysis methods allow for reliable inference from data. Framework and example of this approach.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2002
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N