Response to 'The Singularity' by David Chalmers.
The author presents a comment to the article "The Singularity, a Philosophical Analysis," by David Chalmers. He argues against all three forms of extendibility described in the article, considering both the extendibility of hardware and software. The author also posits that the extendibility of hard...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Consciousness Studies Vol. 19; no. 1/2; pp. 167 - 173 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Imprint Academic
Jan/Feb2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | The author presents a comment to the article "The Singularity, a Philosophical Analysis," by David Chalmers. He argues against all three forms of extendibility described in the article, considering both the extendibility of hardware and software. The author also posits that the extendibility of hardware is not guaranteed because of the lack of a smooth manifold as breakthroughs in hardware design are discontinuous and unpredictable. |
|---|