Hermagoras et la doctrine des ἀσύστατα ('questions sans consistance').
Following Thiele, Matthes attributed the doctrine of ἀσύστατα ('unresolvable questions') to Hermagoras of Temnos (2nd century BCE). Precise analysis and evaluation of the four pertinent testimonies that Matthes assigns to Hermagoras in his edition shed doubt on that attribution. Based on a new argum...
| Publicado en: | Mnemosyne Vol. 65; no. 2; pp. 179 - 203 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Literary Criticism |
| Publicado: |
Brill Academic Publishers
2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=73162280&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 73162280 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00267074 MNM jtl: Mnemosyne issn: 00267074 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: 2012 vid: 65 iid: 2 pid: 639 pub: Brill Academic Publishers artinfo: ui: 73162280 10.1163/156852511X547848 ppf: 179 ppct: 24 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 870KB tig: atl: Hermagoras et la doctrine des ἀσύστατα ('questions sans consistance'). aug: au: Woerther, Frédérique affil: CNRS, UPR 76, Centre Jean Pépin 7, rue Guy Môquet, BP 8, 94801 Villejuif France, Email: woerther@vjf.cnrs.fr su: Hermagoras, of Temnos, fl. ca. 150 B.C. Matthes, D. Hermagorae Temnitae testimonia et fragmenta (Book) Ancient rhetoric Ancient philosophy sug: subj: Hermagoras, of Temnos, fl. ca. 150 B.C. Matthes, D. Hermagorae Temnitae testimonia et fragmenta (Book) Ancient rhetoric Ancient philosophy keyword: στάσεις; ('theory of issues') σύστατα ('unresolvable questions') Hermagoras of Temnos the younger Hermagoras ab: Following Thiele, Matthes attributed the doctrine of ἀσύστατα ('unresolvable questions') to Hermagoras of Temnos (2nd century BCE). Precise analysis and evaluation of the four pertinent testimonies that Matthes assigns to Hermagoras in his edition shed doubt on that attribution. Based on a new argument I propose that only two of these four testimonies should be retained in a forthcoming edition of the fragments of Hermagoras. I also argue that the doctrine of ἀσύστατα is most likely later than the second century BCE. Either that doctrine should be assigned to the younger Hermagoras (2nd century CE), whose theories reached later Latin rhetoricians by a route that is no longer traceable, or the ἀσύστατα doctrine was assigned to a rhetorician of the name Hermagoras by a false supposition or simple error of the common source of the two retained testimonies. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Literary Criticism src: R language: French refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Mnemosyne is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Mnemosyne holder: Brill Academic Publishers dt: @attributes: year: 2012 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|