Why There Cannot be Any Such Thing as 'Time Travel'.

Extending work of Wittgenstein, Lakoff and Johnson I suggest that it is the (spatial) metaphors we rely on in order to conceptualise time that provide an illusory space for time-travel-talk. For example, in the 'Moving Time' spatialisation of time, 'objects' move past the agent from the future to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Investigations Vol. 35; no. 2; pp. 138 - 155
Autor principal: Read, Rupert
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Apr2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=73489702&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 73489702
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01900536
        BS4
      jtl: Philosophical Investigations
      issn: 01900536
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2012
      vid: 35
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        73489702
        10.1111/j.1467-9205.2011.01446.x
      ppf: 138
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 78KB
      tig:
        atl: Why There Cannot be Any Such Thing as 'Time Travel'.
      aug:
        au: Read, Rupert
        affil: Reader in Philosophy at the University of East Anglia (Norwich)
      su:
        Time travel
        Spacetime
        Future (Logic)
        Philosophy
        Thought & thinking
      sug:
        subj:
          Time travel
          Spacetime
          Future (Logic)
          Philosophy
          Thought & thinking
      ab: Extending work of Wittgenstein, Lakoff and Johnson I suggest that it is the (spatial) metaphors we rely on in order to conceptualise time that provide an illusory space for time-travel-talk. For example, in the 'Moving Time' spatialisation of time, 'objects' move past the agent from the future to the past. The objects all move in the same direction - this is mapped to time always moving in the same direction. But then it is easy to imagine suspending this rule, and asking why the objects should not start moving in the opposite direction. This is one way of generating the idea of time-travel 'back' into the past. Time-travel-talk essentially involves the unaware projection of fragments of our time-talk - taken from powerful conceptual metaphors - onto the nature of reality itself. Understanding this dissolves away the charm and attractions of such talk.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophical Investigations is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophical Investigations
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2012
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N