Auditory Long Latency Responses to Tonal and Speech Stimuli.

Purpose: The effects of type of stimuli (i.e., nonspeech vs. speech), speech (i.e., natural vs. synthetic), gender of speaker and listener, speaker (i.e., self vs. other), and frequency alteration in self-produced speech on the late auditory cortical evoked potential were examined. Method: Young adu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 55; no. 2; pp. 447 - 460
Autores principales: Swink, Shannon, Stuart, Andrew
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Apr2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=74184871&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 74184871
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10924388
        1SM
      jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
      issn: 10924388
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2012
      vid: 55
      iid: 2
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        74184871
        10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0364)
      ppf: 447
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 200KB
      tig:
        atl: Auditory Long Latency Responses to Tonal and Speech Stimuli.
      aug:
        au:
          Swink, Shannon
          Stuart, Andrew
        affil: East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
      su:
        Analysis of variance
        Self-evaluation
        Speech
        Auditory evoked response
        Computer software
        Electroencephalography
        Experimental design
        Neuropsychological tests
        Questionnaires
        Speech evaluation
        Vowels
        Wave analysis
        Descriptive statistics
      sug:
        subj:
          Analysis of variance
          Self-evaluation
          Speech
          Software publishers (except video game publishers)
          Computer and software stores
          Computer, computer peripheral and pre-packaged software merchant wholesalers
          Computer and Computer Peripheral Equipment and Software Merchant Wholesalers
          Auditory evoked response
          Computer software
          Electroencephalography
          Experimental design
          Neuropsychological tests
          Questionnaires
          Speech evaluation
          Vowels
          Wave analysis
          Descriptive statistics
      keyword:
        hearing
        late auditory cortical evoked potential
        speech stimuli
        hearing
        late auditory cortical evoked potential
        speech stimuli
      ab: Purpose: The effects of type of stimuli (i.e., nonspeech vs. speech), speech (i.e., natural vs. synthetic), gender of speaker and listener, speaker (i.e., self vs. other), and frequency alteration in self-produced speech on the late auditory cortical evoked potential were examined. Method: Young adult men (n = 15) and women (n = 15), all with normal hearing, participated. P1-N1-P2 components were evoked with the following stimuli: 723Hz tone bursts; naturally produced male and female /a/ tokens; synthetic male and female /a/ tokens; an /a/ token self-produced by each participant; and the same /a/ token produced by the participant but with a shift in frequency. Results: In general, P1-N1-P2 component latencies were significantly shorter when evoked with the tonal stimulus versus speech stimuli and natural versus synthetic speech (p < .05). Women had significantly shorter latencies for only the P2 component (p < .05). For the tonal versus speech stimuli, PI amplitudes were significantly smaller, and N1 and P2 amplitudes were significantly larger (p < .05). There was no significant effect of gender on the PI, N1, or P2 amplitude (p > .05). Condusion: These findings are consistent with the notion that spectrotemporal characteristics of nonspeech and speech stimuli affect PI -- NI -- P2 latency and amplitude components.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N