Metaphors We Die By? Geoengineering, Metaphors, and the Argument From Catastrophe.

Geoengineering the climate by reflecting sunlight or extracting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere has attracted increasing attention from natural scientists, social scientists, policy makers and the media. This article examines promotional discourse related to geoengineering from the 1980s to 2010....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Metaphor & Symbol Vol. 27; no. 2; pp. 131 - 148
Autores principales: Nerlich, Brigitte, Jaspal, Rusi
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=74217660&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 74217660
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10926488
        7MO
      jtl: Metaphor & Symbol
      issn: 10926488
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2012
      vid: 27
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        74217660
        10.1080/10926488.2012.665795
      ppf: 131
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
              db: hlh
              ui: 74217660
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              db: hlh
              ui: 74217660
      tig:
        atl: Metaphors We Die By? Geoengineering, Metaphors, and the Argument From Catastrophe.
      aug:
        au:
          Nerlich, Brigitte
          Jaspal, Rusi
        affil: University of Nottingham
      su:
        Environmental engineering
        Metaphor
        Critical discourse analysis
        Climate change mitigation
        Catastrophism
      sug:
        subj:
          Environmental engineering
          Metaphor
          Critical discourse analysis
          Climate change mitigation
          Catastrophism
      ab: Geoengineering the climate by reflecting sunlight or extracting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere has attracted increasing attention from natural scientists, social scientists, policy makers and the media. This article examines promotional discourse related to geoengineering from the 1980s to 2010. It asks in particular how this option for dealing with the problems posed by climate change were framed through the use of conceptual and discourse metaphors and whether one can argue that these are metaphors we “live by” or metaphors we might “die by.” Findings show that an overarching argument from catastrophe was bolstered by three conceptual master-metaphors, namely “THE PLANET IS A BODY,” “THE PLANET IS A MACHINE,” and “THE PLANET IS A PATIENT/ADDICT,” linked to a variety of discourse metaphors, older conceptual metaphors, and clichés. This metaphorical landscape began to shift while the article was being written and will have to be closely monitored in the future.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N