MENO KŪRINIO INTERPRETACIJŲ VERTINIMO PROBLEMA.
This article addresses the question of how we should assess interpretations of artworks. Metacritical theories often disagree on whether requirements of justice and objectivity for interpretations are reasonable. In particular, many problems arise when dealing with opposite, incompatible interpretat...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 81; pp. 157 - 165 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=74248269&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 74248269 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2012 vid: 81 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 74248269 10.15388/Problemos.2012.0.1283 ppf: 157 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 418KB tig: atl: MENO KŪRINIO INTERPRETACIJŲ VERTINIMO PROBLEMA. aug: au: Budrytė, Edita affil: Lietuvos edukologijos universiteto, Filosofijos katedra, T. Ševčenkos g. 31, LT-03111, Vilnius su: Works of art in art Interpretation (Philosophy) Justice (Philosophy) Monism Pluralism Autonomy (Philosophy) Intentionality (Philosophy) sug: subj: Works of art in art Interpretation (Philosophy) Justice (Philosophy) Monism Pluralism Autonomy (Philosophy) Intentionality (Philosophy) keyword: criterion of truth interpretacija interpretation logic logika objectivity objektyvumas relativism reliatyvizmas tiesos kriterijus interpretacija logika objektyvumas reliatyvizmas tiesos kriterijus ab: This article addresses the question of how we should assess interpretations of artworks. Metacritical theories often disagree on whether requirements of justice and objectivity for interpretations are reasonable. In particular, many problems arise when dealing with opposite, incompatible interpretations of the same artwork. The article reveals two theoretical branches: critical monism and critical pluralism. Monroe Beardsley defends the thesis of "the only correct" interpretation of the artwork, formulating the principles of autonomy and independence while Joseph Margolis offers not to fulfill the criterion of truth, however, to adapt a more relativistic point of view for the assessment of interpretations. This article analyzes the concepts of intentionality and objectivity in relativism given by Margolis as "logic of interpretation". Straipsnyje sprendžiama problema, kaip turėtume vertinti meno kūrinių interpretacijas. Metakritinės teorijos dažnai nesutaria dėl to, ar pagrįstai interpretacijoms keliami teisingumo ir objektyvumo reikalavimai. Ypač daug problemų iškyla, kai susiduriame su prieštaringomis, tarpusavyje nesuderinamomis to paties meno kūrinio interpretacijomis. Straipsnyje atskleidžiamos dvi teorinės kryptys: kritinis monizmas ir kritinis pliuralizmas. Monroe Beardsley'is gina „vienintelės teisingos" interpretacijos tezę, formuluodamas kūrinio „autonomijos ir nepriklausomybės" principus, o Josephas Margolis siūlo atsisakyti tiesos kriterijaus ir taikyti reliatyvistinį požiūrį vertinant interpretacijas. Straipsnyje analizuojamos Margolio pateiktos reliatyvizmo kaip „interpretacijos logikos", intencionalumo ir objektyvumo sąvokos. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2012 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|