HOW COMMON IS OUR COMMON WORLD? HANNAH ARENDT AND THE RISE OF THE SOCIAL.
Based on Hannah Arendt's distinction between the public and the private, the paper argues that it is possible to reconcile her seemingly elite democracy with the political ideals upon which the polis is constructed, namely, plurality, freedom and action. Such reconciliation is possible when the poli...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 81; pp. 98 - 109 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=74248284&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 74248284 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2012 vid: 81 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 74248284 10.15388/Problemos.2012.0.1288 ppf: 98 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 458KB tig: atl: HOW COMMON IS OUR COMMON WORLD? HANNAH ARENDT AND THE RISE OF THE SOCIAL. aug: au: Kattago, Siobhan affil: Department of Philosophy, Estonian Institute of Humanities, Tallinn University, Uus-Sadama 5 10133 Tallinn, Estonia su: Political participation Democracy Hannah Arendt Prize Socialism Liberty Privacy Political science sug: subj: Political participation Democracy Hannah Arendt Prize Socialism Liberty Privacy Political science keyword: Arendt freedom laisvė pasaulis politics politika private privatumas public social socialumas viešumas world Arendt laisvė pasaulis politika privatumas socialumas viešumas ab: Based on Hannah Arendt's distinction between the public and the private, the paper argues that it is possible to reconcile her seemingly elite democracy with the political ideals upon which the polis is constructed, namely, plurality, freedom and action. Such reconciliation is possible when the political is understood as the space between people, rather than as a carefully constructed physical space that excludes all aspects of privacy. Likewise, the paper argues that the rise of the social represents not only the colonialization of the political, but also a democratic expansion of those, who like Arendt herself might have been formerly excluded from political participation in our common world. Remiantis Hannah'os Arendt įvesta viešumo ir privatumo skirtimi, straipsnyje teigiama, jog iš pirmo žvilgsnio elitinę jos demokratiją galima sutaikyti su politiniais idealais, kuriais remiantis kuriamas polis: tai įvairovė, laisvė ir veiksmas. Toks sutaikymas įmanomas, jei politiškumas yra suprantamas kaip erdvė tarp žmonių, o ne skrupulingai suręsta fizinė erdvė, išstumianti visus privatumo aspektus. Straipsnyje taip pat teigiama, kad socialumo iškilimas žymi ne tik politiškumo kolonializaciją, bet ir demokratinę ekspansiją tų, kurie, kaip ir pati Arendt, anksčiau galėjo būti išstumti iš politinio dalyvavimo bendrame pasaulyje. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2012 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|