TITRATION OF LIMITED HOLD TO COMPARISON IN CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION TRAINING AND STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE TESTING.
Reaction time (RT), thought to be important for acquiring a full understanding of the establishment of equivalence classes, has been reported in a number of studies within the area of stimulus equivalence research. In this study, we trained 3 classes of potentially 3 members, with arbitrary stimuli...
| Published in: | Psychological Record Vol. 62; no. 2; pp. 243 - 262 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
Spring2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=74539208&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 74539208 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00332933 PSD jtl: Psychological Record issn: 00332933 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Spring2012 vid: 62 iid: 2 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 74539208 10.1007/BF03395800 ppf: 243 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 570KB tig: atl: TITRATION OF LIMITED HOLD TO COMPARISON IN CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION TRAINING AND STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE TESTING. aug: au: Arntzen, Erik Haugland, Silje affil: Oslo and Akershus University College su: Reaction time Equivalence classes (Set theory) Stimulus generalization Stimulus intensity Equivalence relations (Set theory) sug: subj: Reaction time Equivalence classes (Set theory) Stimulus generalization Stimulus intensity Equivalence relations (Set theory) keyword: limited hold stimulus equivalence time restrictions titration limited hold stimulus equivalence time restrictions titration ab: Reaction time (RT), thought to be important for acquiring a full understanding of the establishment of equivalence classes, has been reported in a number of studies within the area of stimulus equivalence research. In this study, we trained 3 classes of potentially 3 members, with arbitrary stimuli in a one-to-many training structure in 5 adult participants, using a touch screen and software-based recordings. After training the conditional relations, a limited hold (LH) was calculated for each of the 5 participants based on actual RT. Training with a titrating LH in 100-ms steps was conducted until all the participants responded within 1.2 s. Finally, programmed consequences were thinned before testing. We arranged an LH of 2.5 s during the testing for emergent relations. 1 of the 5 participants was found to demonstrate stimulus equivalence. The pattern of increasing RT from baseline trials to symmetry and equivalence test trials was not found. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|