Astronomy and Experimentation.

In this paper I contest Ian Hacking's claim that astronomers do not experiment. Riding on this thesis is a re-evaluation of his view that astronomers are less justified than other natural scientists in believing in the existence of the objects they study, and that astronomers are not proper natural...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Techné: Research in Philosophy & Technology Vol. 14; no. 3; pp. 252 - 270
Autor principal: Sandell, Michelle
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Philosophy Documentation Center Fall2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=75350575&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 75350575
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01617249
        2Y0N
      jtl: Techné: Research in Philosophy & Technology
      issn: 01617249
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Fall2010
      vid: 14
      iid: 3
      pid: 2411
      pub: Philosophy Documentation Center
    artinfo:
      ui: 75350575
      ppf: 252
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.9MB
      tig:
        atl: Astronomy and Experimentation.
      aug:
        au: Sandell, Michelle
      su:
        Astronomy
        Experiments
        Realism
        Computer hacking
        Astronomers
        Natural history
        Scientists
      sug:
        subj:
          Astronomy
          Experiments
          Realism
          Computer hacking
          Astronomers
          Natural history
          Scientists
      keyword:
        astronomy
        experiment
        Hacking
        realism
      ab: In this paper I contest Ian Hacking's claim that astronomers do not experiment. Riding on this thesis is a re-evaluation of his view that astronomers are less justified than other natural scientists in believing in the existence of the objects they study, and that astronomers are not proper natural scientists at all. The defense of my position depends upon carefully examining what, exactly, is being manipulated in an experiment, and the role of experimental effects for Hacking's experimental realism. I argue that Hacking's experimental realism is not adequately defended, and even if we accept it in good grace, the case can be still made that astronomers experiment by Hacking's account.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Techné: Research in Philosophy & Technology is the property of Philosophy Documentation Center and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Techné: Research in Philosophy & Technology
      holder: Philosophy Documentation Center
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2010
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N