The impact of atraumatic vs conventional dressings on pain and stress.

Objective: To compare the pain and stress experiences of patients with chronic wounds being treated with atraumatic vs conventional dressings at dressing change. Method: This exploratory study adopted an independent samples design to identify any differences between reported levels of pain and stres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Wound Care Vol. 21; no. 5; pp. 209 - 214
Autores principales: Upton, D., Solowiej, K.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mark Allen Holdings Limited May2012
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=75495301&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 75495301
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09690700
        H3U
      jtl: Journal of Wound Care
      issn: 09690700
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2012
      vid: 21
      iid: 5
      pid: 11383
      pub: Mark Allen Holdings Limited
    artinfo:
      ui:
        75495301
        104452939
        104452939
        10.12968/jowc.2012.21.5.209
        75495301
      ppf: 209
      ppct: 5
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: The impact of atraumatic vs conventional dressings on pain and stress.
      aug:
        au:
          Upton, D.
          Solowiej, K.
        affil: Professor, Health Psychology
      sug:
        subj:
          Bandages and Dressings
          Pain Psychosocial Factors
          Wounds, Chronic Therapy
          Stress, Psychological
          Human
          Exploratory Research
          Scales
          State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
          Questionnaires
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Hydrocortisone Analysis
          Purposive Sample
          Data Analysis Software
          T-Tests
          Descriptive Statistics
          Male
          Female
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Male
          Female
      ab: Objective: To compare the pain and stress experiences of patients with chronic wounds being treated with atraumatic vs conventional dressings at dressing change. Method: This exploratory study adopted an independent samples design to identify any differences between reported levels of pain and stress associated with the use of atraumatic and conventional dressings used in treatment regimens of patients with chronic wounds. Physiological and psychological assessments of pain and stress were recorded at dressing change (including numerical ratings, heart rate, blood pressure, respiration rate, GSR, salivary cortisol and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire surveys). Results: In total, 49 patients with chronic wounds took part in the study. Fifty-three percent of patients were male (n=26) and 47% were female (n=23). Patients were aged 38-95 years, with a mean age of 69.11 ± 14.08 years. Overall, 10 patients were receiving atraumatic dressings with Safetac technology as part of their routine wound treatment and 39 were receiving conventional dressings. Patients receiving atraumatic dressings reported significantly lower numerical pain and stress ratings and experienced significantly lower GSR at dressing change. Mean heart rate, blood pressure, salivary cortisol were also lower for patients with atraumatic dressings. However, patients' PSS (atraumatic=24.60, conventional=22.72) and STAI (atraumatic=34.90, conventional=33.21) scores were similar for both dressing type groups. Conclusion: This study provides a basis for understanding how different dressing types can impact pain and stress at dressing change. Acute episodes of pain and stress were much lower in patients receiving atraumatic dressings;0 however factors associated with the overall experience of living with a chronic wound may be contributing to underlying and ongoing feelings of stress and anxiety. The impact of these implications on selection of dressings and cost of care are also discussed. Declaration of interest: This research was commissioned by Mölnlycke Health Care. None of the authors work for Mölnlycke Health Care or have any financial interests with the company. There are no additional conflicts of interest to declare.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N