Topic Development, Syntax, and Social Class.

A conclusion of 20 years' research into social class differences in speech is that working class speakers make greater use of pronouns as compared to nouns and use fewer subordinate constructions than do middle-class speakers. These syntactic findings have been linked, in the work of Basil Bernstein...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Discourse Processes Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 267 - 287
Autor principal: Hemphill, Lowry
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jul-Sep89
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=7567525&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 7567525
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0163853X
        7LQ
      jtl: Discourse Processes
      issn: 0163853X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul-Sep89
      vid: 12
      iid: 3
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        7567525
        10.1080/01638538909544731
      ppf: 267
      ppct: 20
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Topic Development, Syntax, and Social Class.
      aug:
        au: Hemphill, Lowry
      su:
        Speech
        Lecturers
        Rhetoric
        Lectures & lecturing
      sug:
        subj:
          Speech
          Lecturers
          Rhetoric
          Lectures & lecturing
      ab: A conclusion of 20 years' research into social class differences in speech is that working class speakers make greater use of pronouns as compared to nouns and use fewer subordinate constructions than do middle-class speakers. These syntactic findings have been linked, in the work of Basil Bernstein and others, to hypothesized differences in class-based language orientations or "codes." The present study uses data from adolescent discussion groups to argue that social class differences in syntax result instead from differences in the conversational styles of working-class and middle-class speakers. Contrasting styles of topic development are documented: a working-class approach which makes use of anaphoric reference and ellipses across speaker turns, and a middle-class approach which identifies topics with full NP's in each new speaker's turn. These approaches to topic development are first tied to differences in the group's turn-taking styles and are then related to observed patterns of pronominal reference and subordination in the two groups.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1989
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N