Polanyi and Peirce on the Critical Method.
This essay points to parallel criticisms made by Charles Peirce and Polanyi against the "critical method"or "method of doubt." In an early set of essays (1868-1869) and in later work, Peirce claimed that the Cartesian method of doubt is both philosophically bankrupt and useless because practitioners...
| Publicado en: | Tradition & Discovery Vol. 38; no. 3; pp. 13 - 31 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Polanyi Society
2011/2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=76338301&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 76338301 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10571027 1HK2 jtl: Tradition & Discovery issn: 10571027 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2011/2012 vid: 38 iid: 3 pid: 26331 pub: Polanyi Society artinfo: ui: 76338301 ppf: 13 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 486KB tig: atl: Polanyi and Peirce on the Critical Method. aug: au: Agler, David W. su: Belief & doubt Polanyi, Michael, 1891-1976 Critical analysis Peirce, Charles S. (Charles Sanders), 1839-1914 Skepticism Descartes, René, 1596-1650 sug: subj: Belief & doubt Polanyi, Michael, 1891-1976 Critical analysis Peirce, Charles S. (Charles Sanders), 1839-1914 Skepticism Descartes, René, 1596-1650 keyword: Charles S. Peirce Descartes method of doubt Michael Polanyi skepticism ab: This essay points to parallel criticisms made by Charles Peirce and Polanyi against the "critical method"or "method of doubt." In an early set of essays (1868-1869) and in later work, Peirce claimed that the Cartesian method of doubt is both philosophically bankrupt and useless because practitioners do not apply the method upon the criteria of doubting itself. Likewise, in his 1952 essay "The Stability of Beliefs" and in Personal Knowledge, Polanyi charges practitioners of the critical method with a failure to apply the method rigorously enough. Polanyi contends that "critical" philosophers apply the method of doubt only to beliefs they find distasteful and rarely ever to the tacit beliefs that make doubt possible. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Tradition & Discovery is the property of Polanyi Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Tradition & Discovery holder: Polanyi Society dt: @attributes: year: 2011 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|