Social Class Differences in N400 Indicate Differences in Spontaneous Trait Inference.

An emerging literature indicates that dispositional bias in causal attribution of social behavior is weaker for people with working-class (vs. middle-class) backgrounds. However, it is unknown whether this difference is also present in spontaneous forms of trait inference. In the current work, Ameri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Experimental Psychology. General Vol. 141; no. 3; pp. 518 - 527
Autores principales: Vamum, Michael E. W., Jinkyung Na, Murata, Asuka, Kitayama, Shinobu
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Psychological Association Aug2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:An emerging literature indicates that dispositional bias in causal attribution of social behavior is weaker for people with working-class (vs. middle-class) backgrounds. However, it is unknown whether this difference is also present in spontaneous forms of trait inference. In the current work, American undergraduates were asked to merely memorize many pairings of a target face and a trait-implying behavior. In a subsequent lexical judgment task, after each face was presented as a fixation, either an implied trait or its antonym was given as a target. As expected, participants with college-educated parents (middle class) showed a strong N400 event-related potential component to the antonym (vs. the implied trait), suggesting spontaneous trait inference during the memorization phase. In contrast, those with high-school-educated parents (working class) showed no such effect. It is important to note that the N400 spontaneous trait inference effect was associated with perceived significance of dispositions in account-ing for social behaviors.