Dissociations in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neuroscience.
In this article, I compare the epistemic standing of the function-to-structure inferences found in cognitive neuroscience and of the inferences based on dissociations in neuropsychology. I argue that the former have a poorer epistemic standing than the latter.
| Publicado en: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 79; no. 4; pp. 490 - 519 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Oct2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=82581724&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 82581724 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318248 PSC jtl: Philosophy of Science issn: 00318248 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2012 vid: 79 iid: 4 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 82581724 10.1086/668002 ppf: 490 ppct: 29 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.3MB tig: atl: Dissociations in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. aug: au: Machery, Edouard affil: Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, 1017CL, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 su: Neuropsychology Cognitive neuroscience Cognitive interference Philosophy of science Philosophy sug: subj: Neuropsychology Cognitive neuroscience Cognitive interference Philosophy of science Philosophy ab: In this article, I compare the epistemic standing of the function-to-structure inferences found in cognitive neuroscience and of the inferences based on dissociations in neuropsychology. I argue that the former have a poorer epistemic standing than the latter. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy of Science holder: Cambridge University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2012 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|